This is a news story, published by Phys Org, that relates primarily to the Max Planck Institute for Human Development news.
For more social media news, you can click here:
more social media newsFor more news from Phys Org, you can click here:
more news from Phys OrgOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like social media news, you might also like this article about
online misinformation. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest less misinformation news, online misinformation veracity judgments news, social media news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
more misinformation onlinePhys Org
•Technology
Technology
91% Informative
Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development have identified who is most susceptible to online misinformation and why.
Their meta-analysis reveals surprising patterns in how demographic and psychological factors—including age, education, political identity, analytical thinking, and motivated reflection—affect people's ability to assess the accuracy of information.
The study challenges assumptions about age and misinformation.
Max Planck Institute for Human Development recently introduced a toolbox designed to help individuals combat misinformation more effectively.
This study is part of a larger initiative by the Center for Adaptive Rationality to investigate the dynamics of online environments.
The researchers aim to gain a comprehensive understanding of how these digital spaces influence politically relevant behaviors and attitudes.
VR Score
95
Informative language
98
Neutral language
38
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
87
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
8
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?
