This is a news story, published by vancouversun, that relates primarily to Olsen news.
For more Olsen news, you can click here:
more Olsen newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from vancouversun, you can click here:
more news from vancouversunOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Olsen. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest reason Olsen news, Olsen learning news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Kirsten Olsenvancouversun
•US Politics
US Politics
65% Informative
B.C. Human Rights Tribunal found Kirsten Olsen discriminated against Terry Wiebe on the basis of gender identity and expression.
Olsen was ordered to pay the $ 10,000 award as compensation for injury to the tenant's dignity.
The tribunal found Olsen made a discriminatory response when she said she would be “uncomfortable’ with having surgery.
Olsen denied using the word “mutilate” and said “you don’t need to mutilate your body’s”.
Terry Wiebe asked Olsen if they can stay on the property if they got the surgery, the tribunal found.
Olsen ’s comments were made as part of “frank, unguarded conversations between friends” — “objectionable,” but not discriminatory.
The tribunal awarded them $ 10,000 for injury to dignity.
VR Score
68
Informative language
66
Neutral language
43
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
52
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
5
