This is a U.S. news story, published by Columbia Journalism Review, that relates primarily to Mark Zuckerberg news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Mark Zuckerberg news, you can click here:
more Mark Zuckerberg newsFor more social media news, you can click here:
more social media newsFor more news from Columbia Journalism Review, you can click here:
more news from Columbia Journalism ReviewOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like social media news, you might also like this article about
political reporting. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest online disinformation news, online misinformation news, social media news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Meta CEO Mark ZuckerbergColumbia Journalism Review
•
75% Informative
Mark Zuckerberg announced January 7 that Meta would be ending its third -party fact-checking program.
The social media giant had donated more than $100 million to 90 independent newsrooms and fact-checkers registered with the International Fact-Checking Network .
The decision came down three weeks before the inauguration of Donald Trump , who has cast Meta as an “enemy of the people”.
Meta is severing its relationship with fact-checkers in the U.S. in order to appease the incoming Trump administration.
Mark Zuckerberg thought that he could protect commercial interests by making this public policy shift.
So far, this only applies to the US , but there's good reason to fear that it's only the first step, and that Meta will eliminate this gradually around the world.
Fact-checkers have never promised to be the answer to online misinformation.
They are held to the standard that other journalists are not held to.
Journalists accept that their work often reaches fewer people than it should, and that it doesn't have the impacts that they hope that it would.
VR Score
75
Informative language
72
Neutral language
38
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
50
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
11
Source diversity
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links