Rubio's Inaugural Visit to Panama
This is a Panama news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
Panama news
For more Panama news, you can click here:
more Panama newsDonald Trump news
For more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsNews about Us involvement in foreign conflicts
For more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:
more Us involvement in foreign conflicts newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about
Panama Canal. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Panama Canal Authority news, Panamanian sovereignty news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Panama PortsCNN
•US Politics
US Politics
Does a ‘foreign power’ threaten the Panama Canal? Here’s what you need to know
68% Informative
President Donald Trump has made repeated demands for control of the Panama Canal .
In his inauguration speech, Trump mentioned Panama six times, more than any other foreign country.
Trump has long complained about the “bad deal” Jimmy Carter made when he returned the canal to Panama in 1977 .
To date there is no evidence of Chinese military activity in Panama .
Under the 1977 treaty, the US returned the canal with the understanding that the waterway remain neutral.
A US occupation of the canal would fly in the face of international law and the treaty the US agreed to.
Trying to wrest the canal back by force from an ally would be a propaganda goldmine for Russia and China .
VR Score
67
Informative language
63
Neutral language
39
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links