Senate Republicans Back Trump's Firing
This is a news story, published by Yahoo, that relates primarily to the Department of Defense and Department of State news.
News about Us political corruption
For more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsYahoo news
For more news from Yahoo, you can click here:
more news from YahooAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
independent government watchdogs. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest independent watchdogs news, federal agencies news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
inspectors generalReuters
•US Politics
US Politics
Some Senate Republicans defend Trump's firing of 17 inspectors general
78% Informative
Inspectors general were abruptly fired on Friday evening from agencies such as the Department of Defense and Department of State .
The move ran afoul of federal law, requiring the president to notify Congress 30 days in advance and provide a detailed explanation for their removal.
Independent watchdogs are nonpartisan, and typically serve across multiple presidential administrations.
VR Score
89
Informative language
94
Neutral language
65
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links