This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to House news.
For more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:
more Us involvement in foreign conflicts newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about
Laken Riley Act. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Laken Riley bill news, House Democrats news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
illegal immigration crackdownPolitico
•US Politics
US Politics
76% Informative
Forty-eight House Democrats voted Tuesday to advance an illegal immigration crackdown known as the Laken Riley Act .
That’s up from the 37 Democrats who backed the bill last March .
The Senate is set to take up the bill Friday , and already three Democrats are planning to advance it.
The GOP still faces momentous challenges as it tries to pass the remainder of its border policy agenda.
For much of it, they are counting on using the budget reconciliation process, which would not require Democratic help.
But the rules governing reconciliation likely preclude the inclusion of sweeping immigration restrictions.
VR Score
79
Informative language
78
Neutral language
24
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
17
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
