This is a news story, published by Institute for Fiscal Studies, that relates primarily to Andrew Dilnot news.
For more Andrew Dilnot news, you can click here:
more Andrew Dilnot newsFor more inflation news, you can click here:
more inflation newsFor more news from Institute for Fiscal Studies, you can click here:
more news from Institute for Fiscal StudiesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about inflation, you might also like this article about
ruinous social care costs. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest social care news, Adult social care news, news about inflation, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
social care provisionInstitute for Fiscal Studies
•Business
Business & Economics
69% Informative
Sir Andrew Dilnot described as a tragedy’ this government’s abandonment of the long fought for implementation of his plan —published all the way back in 2011 —to limit the costs that individuals should face.
Around one in seven 65-year-olds can expect to spend more than 100,000 on their social care.
We know the answer, we can limit the total amount that anyone should spend on social care over their life.
Navigating a hopelessly complex system with inconsistent provision and a hazy line between free healthcare and paid-for social care is a nightmare.
Many will have to spend a lifetime’s accumulated assets when they had every right to expect they had escaped that fate until this government abandoned the changes that would have spared them.
VR Score
74
Informative language
73
Neutral language
42
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
43
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?
