Trump's Lame-Duck Status Uncertain
This is a news story, published by The Bulwark, that relates primarily to David Gergen news.
David Gergen news
For more David Gergen news, you can click here:
more David Gergen newsNews about Us federal elections
For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsThe Bulwark news
For more news from The Bulwark, you can click here:
more news from The BulwarkAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
lame duck. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest incoming president news, Trump news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
future presidentThe Bulwark
•Will He or Won’t He?
65% Informative
David Gergen : People believe that Trump is probably a lame duck, but no one is absolutely certain of it.
He says the longer he holds out the prospect of a third term, the more power he has over the Republican party .
Gergen says the Supreme Court could decide to legitimize that act if it were legitimized by John Roberts' report.
John Sutter : Is Trump a lame duck? Maybe, maybe, but maybe not.
He says he's skeptical that the Supreme Court would try to stop him from running for a third term.
Sutter says a Rolex Cosmograph Yacht Master' Ref. 6242 appears to have been an actual Rolex project which never came to fruition.
Plessy was a “flagrant violation of the Constitution .” What, exactly, is the limit to “judicial supremacy”? One effect of a conflict between the Trump administration and the courts could be to cause chaos in the administration of normal government functions.
The swing votes on the Court would see that there are three possible outcomes: They rule Trump can’t run and Trump abides by their ruling.
Punting would be functionally identical to # 3 , but might preserve for the Court the illusion that they possess some controlling authority. Punting is functionally identical.
VR Score
60
Informative language
51
Neutral language
43
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
34
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links