Editorial Board Resigns from JHE
This is a news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Technica news.
Technica news
For more Technica news, you can click here:
more Technica newsbiology news
For more biology news, you can click here:
more biology newsWired news
For more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like biology news, you might also like this article about
science journal. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest reputable scientific journal news, journal Nature news, biology news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Elsevier journalWired
•Editors at Science Journal Resign En Masse Over Bad Use of AI, High Fees
80% Informative
All but one member of the editorial board of the Journal of Human Evolution (JHE) resigned over the holiday weekend .
It's the 20th mass resignation from a science journal since 2023 over various points of contention.
Elsevier has long had its share of vocal critics (including Ars Technica ’s Chris Lee ).
John Hawks , an anthropologist at the University of WisconsinMadison , has published 17 papers in JHE over his career.
He expressed his support for the board members’ decision on his blog, along with shock at the revelation that Elsevier had introduced AI to its editorial process in 2023 .
VR Score
78
Informative language
78
Neutral language
1
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
16
Source diversity
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links