Dana Stubblefield's Rape Conviction Reversed
This is a San Francisco news story, published by Yahoo News Canada, that relates primarily to Dana Stubblefield's news.
San Francisco news
For more San Francisco news, you can click here:
more San Francisco newsDana Stubblefield's news
For more Dana Stubblefield's news, you can click here:
more Dana Stubblefield's newsNews about civil rights activism
For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsYahoo News Canada news
For more news from Yahoo News Canada, you can click here:
more news from Yahoo News CanadaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Stubblefield. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest conviction news, California Racial Justice Act news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Dana StubblefieldLos Angeles Times
•Former NFL star Dana Stubblefield could be released this week after 2020 rape conviction is reversed
82% Informative
Dana Stubblefield's 2020 rape conviction was reversed by an appellate court because of “ racially discriminatory language ” by the prosecution during the trial.
An attorney for the former San Francisco 49ers star said he expects his release from custody within days .
The appellate court's decision was based on language used in the prosecution's closing argument, which began nearly two months after a white police officer killed George Floyd .
VR Score
82
Informative language
79
Neutral language
81
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links