Police Chief Backs Officer Cuts
This is a England news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Paul Sanford news.
England news
For more England news, you can click here:
more England newsPaul Sanford news
For more Paul Sanford news, you can click here:
more Paul Sanford newsNews about Us police misconduct
For more Us police misconduct news, you can click here:
more Us police misconduct newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us police misconduct, you might also like this article about
fewer officers. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest police effectiveness news, new officers news, news about Us police misconduct, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
more officersGuardian
•Forces should cut officer numbers and use tech to fight crime, police chief says
84% Informative
Police chiefs in England and Wales have said they need 3bn extra to fight crime properly.
Chief constable Paul Sanford said there was an obsession with officer numbers.
He said it would often be more effective to have fewer officers supported by better technology.
Police officers cannot be made redundant so forces have balanced budgets by cutting civilian staff or community support officers.
VR Score
85
Informative language
83
Neutral language
74
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links