GOP Probes Child Gender Transitions
This is a America news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to HHS news.
America news
For more America news, you can click here:
more America newsNews about health policy
For more health policy news, you can click here:
more health policy newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about health policy, you might also like this article about
medical gender reassignment interventions. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest gender dysphoria treatments minors news, gender reassignment procedures news, news about health policy, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
gender reassignment surgeriesThe Center Square
•Gender transition procedures for minors receive increased scrutiny from emboldened GOP
75% Informative
GOP -led House Committee on Energy and Commerce calls HHS a "global outlier" for its promotion of puberty blockers and reconstructive surgeries for children.
The lawmakers cited European studies and restrictions that apparently contradict the HHS ’ assertions that such procedures are beneficial.
The number of gender transition procedures on minors in America has risen significantly over the past five years .
VR Score
75
Informative language
72
Neutral language
59
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
76
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links