Supreme Court Ethics Inquiry
This is a news story, published by ABC News, that relates primarily to Thomas news.
Thomas news
For more Thomas news, you can click here:
more Thomas newsNews about SCOTUS
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsABC News news
For more news from ABC News, you can click here:
more news from ABC NewsAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Supreme Court ethics. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Justice Clarence Thomas news, new ethics code news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Supreme Court ethics detailsABC News
•Senate review of Supreme Court ethics finds more luxury trips and urges enforceable code of conduct
87% Informative
Senate review of Supreme Court ethics finds more luxury trips and urges enforceable code of conduct.
Investigation found that Thomas has accepted gifts and travel from wealthy benefactors worth more than $4.75 million .
Thomas has said that he was not required to disclose the trips that he and his wife, Ginni , took with a big donor because the big donor is a close friend of the family.
Republicans have said the investigation is a way to undermine the conservative majority court.
VR Score
92
Informative language
92
Neutral language
69
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
21
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links