Stanley Park Tree Removal Controversy
This is a Vancouver news story, published by Global News, that relates primarily to Bruce Blackwell news.
Vancouver news
For more Vancouver news, you can click here:
more Vancouver newsBruce Blackwell news
For more Bruce Blackwell news, you can click here:
more Bruce Blackwell newsNews about extreme weather and cataclysms
For more extreme weather and cataclysms news, you can click here:
more extreme weather and cataclysms newsGlobal News news
For more news from Global News, you can click here:
more news from Global NewsAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about extreme weather and cataclysms, you might also like this article about
Stanley Park forest. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest damaging windstorm news, infected trees news, news about extreme weather and cataclysms, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
tree removalGlobal News
•Why this company says thousands of trees must be removed from Stanley Park - BC | Globalnews.ca
63% Informative
Report recommended removal of thousands of trees from Vancouver 's Stanley Park has sparked controversy.
Consultant Bruce Blackwell says the only purpose of the removal is to protect public safety.
He says between 20,000 and 30,000 trees will need to be removed, far fewer than the 160,000 that have been affected.
Save Stanley Park group has taken the city to court claiming the plan isn’t backed by science.
VR Score
66
Informative language
64
Neutral language
63
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
36
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links