Supreme Court Denies Broadband Challenge

This is a New York news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to The Supreme Court news.

New York news

For more New York news, you can click here:

more New York news

News about SCOTUS

For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:

more SCOTUS news

Ars Technica news

For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:

more news from Ars Technica

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about

net neutrality law

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest net neutrality order news, appeals court ruling news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

net neutrality rules

Ars Technica

•

Big loss for ISPs as Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to $15 broadband law

Summary

Nutrition label

79% Informative

The Supreme Court won't take up the broadband industry's challenge to a New York law that requires broadband providers to offer $ 15- or $ 20 -per-month service to people with low incomes.

In August , six trade groups representing the cable, telecom, mobile, and satellite industries filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to overturn an appeals court ruling that upheld the state law.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

not offensive

Hate speech

not hateful