US Disappointed in Plastic Pollution Talks
This is a South Korea news story, published by MSN.
South Korea news
For more South Korea news, you can click here:
more South Korea newsclimate change news
For more climate change news, you can click here:
more climate change newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like climate change news, you might also like this article about
plastic pollution. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest plastic waste news, plastic producers news, climate change news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
microplasticsAFP.com
•US 'disappointed' after plastic pollution talks collapse: White House
72% Informative
Delegates from nearly 200 nations debated for a week in South Korea on how to stop millions of tonnes of plastic waste from entering the environment each year .
The talks were meant to end with the world's first accord on cutting plastic pollution after nearly two years of discussions.
Delegations seeking an ambitious treaty earlier warned that a handful of countries was steadfastly blocking progress.
The world's top two plastic producers -- China and the United States -- have stayed relatively quiet about their positions in public.
VR Score
81
Informative language
84
Neutral language
56
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links