This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to stung news.
For more stung news, you can click here:
more stung newsFor more workforce / labor news, you can click here:
more workforce / labor newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like workforce / labor news, you might also like this article about
postal executives. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest United States Postal Service news, Postal Service news, workforce / labor news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
executive actions TrumpWashington Post
•
78% Informative
The Postal Service lost $9.5 billion in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30 , stung by continued declines in mail volume and a slower-than-anticipated parcel shipping business.
Cuts to the Postal Service could upend the trillion-dollar e-commerce industry, hitting small businesses and rural consumers whose businesses and budgets make the agency the shipper of choice.
The Postal Service has three vacancies on its nine -member governing board; three are Republicans , two are Trump appointees.
Cutting off the agency’s access to loans from the Treasury Department could quickly stifle the Postal Service .
Democrats are already warning of potential cuts to the nation's mail carrier.
VR Score
80
Informative language
79
Neutral language
42
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links