Chiniki, Goodstoney Reject Bearspaw Lawsuit
This is a Canada news story, published by calgaryherald, that relates primarily to Chiniki news.
Canada news
For more Canada news, you can click here:
more Canada newsNews about labor activism
For more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newscalgaryherald news
For more news from calgaryherald, you can click here:
more news from calgaryheraldAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
Goodstoney First Nations. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Bearspaw First Nation news, Chiniki First Nation CEO news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Bearspaw lawsuitcalgaryherald
•Chiniki, Goodstoney First Nations not opting into lawsuit against Canada
62% Informative
Chiniki and Goodstoney First Nations will not opt in to the lawsuit that Bearspaw filed against Canada in November .
Instead, the two nations are pursuing settlements with Canada , which they said is similar to other annuity claims being made across the country, such as in Treaty 6 and 8 territories.
The $ 5 annuity payments to members of Treaty 7 Nations have held at $ 5 annually since 1877 .
VR Score
72
Informative language
73
Neutral language
82
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources