Microsoft Shareholders Reject Bitcoin Proposal
This is a news story, published by CoinGape, that relates primarily to Bitcoin news.
Bitcoin news
For more Bitcoin news, you can click here:
more Bitcoin newscrypto trading & speculation news
For more crypto trading & speculation news, you can click here:
more crypto trading & speculation newsCoinGape news
For more news from CoinGape, you can click here:
more news from CoinGapeAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like crypto trading & speculation news, you might also like this article about
Microsoft shareholders vote. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Bitcoin advocate Michael Saylor news, Bitcoin proposal news, crypto trading & speculation news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Microsoft shareholdersCoinGape
•Breaking: Microsoft Shareholders Vote Against Bitcoin Proposal
68% Informative
Microsoft shareholders have voted against the Bitcoin proposal to allocate some of the company’s cash reserves to the flagship crypto.
Bitcoin advocate Michael Saylor had pitched to these shareholders why they should vote for the company to hold Bitcoin on its balance sheet.
With this development, the company will unlikely adopt Bitcoin anytime soon.
While Microsoft opts against buying Bitcoin , other companies like MicroStrategy are actively accumulating Bitcoin .
VR Score
49
Informative language
36
Neutral language
70
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
66
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links