This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Liz Truss news.
For more Liz Truss news, you can click here:
more Liz Truss newsFor more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
security bill. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Secret Service news, security news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
assassination attemptsTelegraph
•US Politics
US Politics
62% Informative
The cost of protecting all eight former living prime ministers has reached 10 million a year.
The cost has been described as unsustainable’ by an anonymous source.
The public has to foot the bill to keep the likes of Liz Truss safe and Tony Blair safe.
We protect our former prime ministers because they are former PMs.
The cost of securing the safety of our ex-PMs doesn’t have to be publicly approved, it just has to be met.
By withdrawing or reducing funding and protection for any of those eight former holders of the highest office, we would be signalling open season to any politically-motivated nutter with a kitchen knife.
VR Score
59
Informative language
53
Neutral language
13
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
