Democrat undecided on Pentagon bill
This is a D-Wash. news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Adam Smith news.
D-Wash. news
For more D-Wash. news, you can click here:
more D-Wash. newsAdam Smith news
For more Adam Smith news, you can click here:
more Adam Smith newsNews about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
Pentagon policy bill. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest defense bill news, annual National Defense Authorization Act news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Pentagon billPolitico
•Defense bill could hit last-minute snag over transgender provision
74% Informative
Rep. Adam Smith ( D-Wash. ) said he's still undecided on how he'll vote on a Pentagon policy bill he helped negotiate.
Republicans insisted on language aimed at medical treatments for transgender children.
Smith said the transgender provision “violates a principle” of keeping issues that are non-starters for either party out of bill.
VR Score
78
Informative language
78
Neutral language
46
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links