Saban Criticizes Rivalry Brawl Fines
This is a Michigan news story, published by New York Post, that relates primarily to Nick Saban news.
Michigan news
For more Michigan news, you can click here:
more Michigan newsNick Saban news
For more Nick Saban news, you can click here:
more Nick Saban newsfootball news
For more football news, you can click here:
more football newsNew York Post news
For more news from New York Post, you can click here:
more news from New York PostAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like football news, you might also like this article about
Nick Saban. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Ohio State players news, Michigan players news, football news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
BuckeyesNew York Post
•Nick Saban blasts Michigan, Ohio State and NCAA for all parts of ‘disrespectful’ brawl controversy
50% Informative
Nick Saban ripped Michigan and Ohio State for their brawl after the Wolverines ’ 13 -10 win last Saturday .
The legendary former coach wasn’t happy with anyone involved.
He also blasted the NCAA for fining each program $ 100K.
“I think that you have to protect the brand. If college football players want to be paid, which they’re getting paid now, then they have to do something to protect their brand,” Saban said.
VR Score
53
Informative language
53
Neutral language
1
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
31
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
likely hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links