Judges Question AI Evidence Authenticity

This is a U.S. news story, published by Gizmodo, that relates primarily to AI news.

U.S. news

For more U.S. news, you can click here:

more U.S. news

News about Ai policy and regulations

For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:

more Ai policy and regulations news

Gizmodo news

For more news from Gizmodo, you can click here:

more news from Gizmodo

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about

court evidence

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest video evidence news, Evidence Rules news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

expert witnesses

Gizmodo

•

How to We Stop Deepfakes From Tricking Juries?

Summary

Nutrition label

82% Informative

Legal scholars are calling for changes to rules governing court evidence in the U.S. for 50 years .

They want to shift the burden of determining authenticity away from juries and place more responsibility on judges to separate fact from fiction before trials begin.

Proposed changes would empower judges to exert a stronger gatekeeping role over evidence.

A new rule would require that the party claiming a piece of evidence is AI -generated obtain a forensic expert’s opinion regarding its authenticity well before a trial began.

The judge would then decide whether the evidence in question is real and therefore admissible.

Delfino proposes that a party making the deepfake allegation should pay for the forensic expertâs.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

informal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

possibly offensive