NASA Reconsiders ISS Continuous Presence
This is a news story, published by SpaceNews, that relates primarily to Pam Melroy news.
Pam Melroy news
For more Pam Melroy news, you can click here:
more Pam Melroy newsspace technology news
For more space technology news, you can click here:
more space technology newsSpaceNews news
For more news from SpaceNews, you can click here:
more news from SpaceNewsAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like space technology news, you might also like this article about
ISS alternatives. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Commercial space station news, ISS replacement news, space technology news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Commercial space station developersSpaceNews
•Space station developers weigh in on NASA’s continuous presence rethink
70% Informative
Commercial space station developers question NASA 's reconsideration of continuous human presence in space.
NASA Deputy Administrator Pam Melroy last month said agency was reassessing whether it needed a “continuous heartbeat or a continuous capability” The assessment will influence the next phase of NASA ’s Commercial LEO Development program.
Vast CEO Max Haot is optimistic the shift will allow for the procurement of an initial space station module not permanently crewed.
VR Score
77
Informative language
79
Neutral language
63
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links