Trump's Mandate for Leadership Project
This is a news story, published by Washington Examiner, that relates primarily to Tom Homan news.
Tom Homan news
For more Tom Homan news, you can click here:
more Tom Homan newsNews about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsWashington Examiner news
For more news from Washington Examiner, you can click here:
more news from Washington ExaminerAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
future Trump administration. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Federal Communications Commission news, FCC accountability news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Trump campaign manager ChrisWashington Examiner
•Trump returning to Project 2025 authors after rejecting their work on the trail - Washington Examiner
71% Informative
Project 2025 produced a book called Mandate for Leadership the Conservative Promise .
Trump is expected to tap some of the contributors of the book.
The book was written by Tom Homan and Brendan Carr , who wrote a section on the FCC .
The Democratic National Committee slammed Trump for working with people he had previously denounced.
VR Score
74
Informative language
71
Neutral language
41
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links