Trump's Cabinet Nominees Questioned
This is a news story, published by Christian Science Monitor, that relates primarily to Mike Johnson news.
Mike Johnson news
For more Mike Johnson news, you can click here:
more Mike Johnson newsNews about Us congress
For more Us congress news, you can click here:
more Us congress newsChristian Science Monitor news
For more news from Christian Science Monitor, you can click here:
more news from Christian Science MonitorAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us congress, you might also like this article about
controversial Cabinet selections. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Senate approval news, Senate confirmation news, news about Us congress, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Trump appointmentsChristian Science Monitor
•Can Trump bypass the Senate to ram through controversial nominees like Matt Gaetz?
77% Informative
The U.S. Senate has always voted on whether to confirm a president’s nominees for major posts.
Some Senate Republicans have downplayed the prospect, saying “The traditional process will work and we need to do it fast” House Speaker Mike Johnson has indicated he may be open to such a plan.
Any attempt at this maneuver is almost certain to be challenged in court.
If Mr. Trump gets a congressional recess, he could appoint whomever he wants to whatever roles he wants potentially moving hundreds of nominees with no say from Congress .
It's unclear to what extent the Republican leaders of the House and Senate are willing to abdicate their constitutional responsibilities and become a factotum of Trump .
The Founders viewed the Senate ’s role in the appointment process “as a critical protection against despotism,’” Justice Scalia wrote.
He called the recess appointments language in the Constitution an “anachronism” from the horse-and-buggy era.
Since that ruling a decade ago , Congress has refused to go into recess.
VR Score
77
Informative language
73
Neutral language
65
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
6
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links