UK Opposes Nuclear War Panel
This is a UK news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to UN news.
UK news
For more UK news, you can click here:
more UK newsNews about Us involvement in foreign conflicts
For more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:
more Us involvement in foreign conflicts newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about
UN general assembly committee resolution. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest international scientific inquiry news, nuclear war research news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Nuclear weapons expertsGuardian
•UK says it voted against UN nuclear war panel because consequences already known
74% Informative
Foreign Office said the devastating consequences’ of nuclear war are already well known.
UK , France and Russia voted against a UN committee resolution to set up a new study.
Backers of the motion said the last such UN study had been carried out towards the end of the cold war and that a lot had changed since then.
VR Score
76
Informative language
75
Neutral language
34
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links