This is a news story, published by Telegraph, that relates primarily to Wes Streeting news.
For more Wes Streeting news, you can click here:
more Wes Streeting newsFor more health policy news, you can click here:
more health policy newsFor more news from Telegraph, you can click here:
more news from TelegraphOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about health policy, you might also like this article about
assisted death. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest unreformed NHS news, libertarian MPs news, news about health policy, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
assisted dyingTelegraph
•
53% Informative
The national debate on assisted dying is both moving and frustrating.
The Government has failed to uphold vital neutrality in the debate.
Wes Streeting has acted like a mouthpiece for NHS bureaucracy voicing concerns.
Kim Leadbeater has imperilled the entire exercise by calling for MPs to step back’ so we can hear from those with personal experience.
Given that there are so few remaining libertarian MPs, the moral case for assisted dying is unlikely to get much of an airing.
What sets our species apart from others is its capacity to imagine alternative futures and make choices accordingly.
Yet, when it comes to liberty, the sanctity of human will is a particular blind spot.
VR Score
57
Informative language
56
Neutral language
14
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
50
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links