This is a South Korea news story, published by DW, that relates primarily to Donald Trump's news.
For more South Korea news, you can click here:
more South Korea newsFor more Donald Trump's news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump's newsFor more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:
more Us involvement in foreign conflicts newsFor more news from DW, you can click here:
more news from DWOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about
nuclear arms possession. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest nuclear weapons policy news, own nuclear weapons news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
domestic nuclear weapons capabilityDW
•75% Informative
Donald Trump's election victory in South Korea has prompted many to ask if South Korea should develop its own nuclear deterrence.
Recent surveys show 70% of South Koreans now favor the development and deployment of an independent nuclear deterrent.
The more the U.S. denigrates and neglects the alliance with the South , the more South Korea will entertain its intention of obtaining nuclear weapons, says Mason Richey .
The cost of development and maintenance of such weapons is extremely high.
VR Score
79
Informative language
78
Neutral language
67
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links