This is a news story, published by ABC News, that relates primarily to Jordan news.
For more Jordan news, you can click here:
more Jordan newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from ABC News, you can click here:
more news from ABC NewsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
next defense secretary. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta news, former Defense Secretary Panetta news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Defense SecretaryABC News
•73% Informative
Fmr. Defense Secretary pushes back on nominee's claim that women shouldn't serve in combat units.
Pete Hegseth's comments have raised concerns among former servicememembers with first -hand experience serving in integrated units.
Panetta ended the Pentagon 's ban on women serving in ground combat units in 2013 .
Of the more than one million active-duty military personnel, 17.5% are women.
"Gender does not determine whether or not someone has the physical strength, or competency to serve in these units," says Garrett Jordan .
Jordan : "There is a standard, and if soldiers, regardless of gender are meeting it, then they should have the opportunity to serve" Jordan says women in training classes he commanded "maintained the standard".
VR Score
82
Informative language
84
Neutral language
72
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links