Which? Sues Apple Over iCloud
This is a U.K. news story, published by TechCrunch, that relates primarily to Apple news.
U.K. news
For more U.K. news, you can click here:
more U.K. newsNews about operating systems
For more operating systems news, you can click here:
more operating systems newsTechCrunch news
For more news from TechCrunch, you can click here:
more news from TechCrunchAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about operating systems, you might also like this article about
cloud storage market. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Apple customers news, iCloud news, news about operating systems, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
eligible Apple customersTechCrunch
•Apple faces UK 'iCloud monopoly' compensation claim worth $3.8 billion | TechCrunch
75% Informative
U.K. consumer rights group Which?’ is filing a legal claim against Apple under competition law on behalf of some 40 million users of iCloud .
The collective proceeding lawsuit, which is seeking 3 billion in compensation damages ( around $3.8 billion at current exchange rates), alleges that Apple has broken competition rules by giving its own cloud storage service preferential treatment and effectively locking people into paying for iCloud .
VR Score
67
Informative language
60
Neutral language
74
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links