This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Warner news.
For more music news, you can click here:
more music newsFor more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like music news, you might also like this article about
album damages. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest song damages news, infringement news, music news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
copyright infringement caseArs Technica
•
81% Informative
Universal, Warner , and Sony are seeking an en banc rehearing of the copyright infringement case.
They want the per-album portion of the ruling reversed while leaving the rest of it intact.
The case is in the conservative-leaning US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit .
A three -judge panel unanimously ruled last month that Grande Communications violated the law by failing to terminate subscribers accused of piracy.
VR Score
86
Informative language
89
Neutral language
28
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links