This is a Baku news story, published by SWI, that relates primarily to the UN Climate Change Conference news.
For more Baku news, you can click here:
more Baku newsFor more climate change news, you can click here:
more climate change newsFor more news from SWI, you can click here:
more news from SWIOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like climate change news, you might also like this article about
funding climate projects. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest climate finance obligations news, climate finance news, climate change news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
future climate finance agreementsSWI
•
88% Informative
Controversial proposal will be tabled at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP29) opening today in Baku , Azerbaijan .
Until now, the question of who should fund transition to a low-emissions society has landed on the world’s richest countries.
Developing countries need $500 billion a year to stave off the effects of global warming.
The Swiss proposal to broaden the pool of donor countries is a 'pragmatic response' to the growing urgency of climate action.
Emerging economies oppose a revision of the donor pool.
The Swiss model has the advantage of allowing new countries to be included as contributors once they have reached the established thresholds of emissions and wealth.
VR Score
90
Informative language
91
Neutral language
57
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
14
Source diversity
13
Affiliate links
no affiliate links