Reeves Seeks Private Advice on Waste
This is a the City of London news story, published by The Times & The Sunday Times, that relates primarily to Rachel Reeves news.
the City of London news
For more the City of London news, you can click here:
more the City of London newsRachel Reeves news
For more Rachel Reeves news, you can click here:
more Rachel Reeves newsNews about health policy
For more health policy news, you can click here:
more health policy newsThe Times & The Sunday Times news
For more news from The Times & The Sunday Times, you can click here:
more news from The Times & The Sunday TimesAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about health policy, you might also like this article about
next spending review. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest spending review news, spending review risks news, news about health policy, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
public spendingThe Times & The Sunday Times
•Tell us how we can cut Whitehall waste, Rachel Reeves begs industry
67% Informative
Rachel Reeves will appeal to the private sector to advise the government on how to reduce waste in public services.
She will use her first Mansion House speech in the City of London on Thursday to say that the government alone cannot deliver value for money.
The chancellor will conduct a spending review in the spring , setting out government's priorities for spending over the next three years .
VR Score
72
Informative language
71
Neutral language
69
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
47
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links