This is a news story, published by Washingtonian - The website that Washington lives by., that relates primarily to Julian Zelizer news.
For more Julian Zelizer news, you can click here:
more Julian Zelizer newsFor more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsFor more news from Washingtonian - The website that Washington lives by., you can click here:
more news from Washingtonian - The website that Washington lives by.Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
male voters. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest partisan gender gap news, performative masculinity news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
masculinityWashingtonian - The website that Washington lives by.
•
67% Informative
The GOP ran a more successful campaign as a men's party than the Democrats did as a women's party.
Democrats lost ground among men, but the gender gap wasn't as big as expected as expected.
The issue of abortion didn't weigh heavily enough to pull women in the Democratic direction, says Julian Zelizer .
Men seem to have been generally a bit more motivated by economic issues than culture war issues.
Republicans spoke to the sense that men are struggling economically and unsure of their place in society.
Democrats ceded that ground, and the Republicans happily took it.
The issues around tax cuts and the economy for sure resonated with men.
Democrats could have said that working class men haven’t had a great time in recent decades , and Republicans over here claim to care about that, so why did they vote against it? Democrats thought it would somehow be seen as anti-women, says Julian Zelizer .
Zelizer: The debate I hoped for in this election was around competing visions of how to help men.
VR Score
74
Informative language
77
Neutral language
39
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
33
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
14
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links