Trump's Land Policy Shifts
This is a news story, published by Bloomberg Law, that relates primarily to Project 2025 news.
Project 2025 news
For more Project 2025 news, you can click here:
more Project 2025 newsclimate change news
For more climate change news, you can click here:
more climate change newsBloomberg Law news
For more news from Bloomberg Law, you can click here:
more news from Bloomberg LawAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like climate change news, you might also like this article about
federal lands agenda. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal lands management news, Divesting Federal Lands news, climate change news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
public lands agendaBloomberg Law
•Public Lands Outlook Under Trump to Face 'Copious Litigation'
83% Informative
Environmental groups say theyâll litigate at every opportunity to influence the new administration.
Project 2025 calls for a rapid ramp-up of oil, natural gas, and coal production on federal lands.
The project also calls on Congress to repeal the Antiquities Act and shrink national monuments created under the law.
Environmental attorneys say they hope the Trump administration can be constrained by environmental laws.
Many conservation groups oppose the concept of using public lands for housing purposes, and would likely challenge those decisions.
At best, conservationists are likely to hold the line against Trump administration efforts to exploit federal lands for fossil fuels.
VR Score
84
Informative language
83
Neutral language
61
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
75
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links