This is a news story, published by Nebraska Examiner, that relates primarily to Jim Pillen news.
For more Jim Pillen news, you can click here:
more Jim Pillen newsFor more real estate & housing news, you can click here:
more real estate & housing newsFor more news from Nebraska Examiner, you can click here:
more news from Nebraska ExaminerOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like real estate & housing news, you might also like this article about
property tax relief. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Nebraska lawmakers news, property tax increases news, real estate & housing news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
additional property tax reliefNebraska Examiner
•87% Informative
Gov. Jim Pillen is calling on Nebraska lawmakers to address “inconsistencies” in the state’s main school aid formula.
Pillen pointed to a new report from his policy research office that compiled property tax data for new state senators.
The governor noted that newly elected senators might not have a complete understanding of the state's funding formula.
Lawmakers will return with a 2025 proposal that will be smaller but still “take a little bite” out of reforming TEEOSA.
“The formula is inconsistent and hits taxpayers hard,” the policy research office report states.
The Legislature helped to increase aid to schools by doubling special education reimbursements from 40% of expenditures to 80% .
VR Score
92
Informative language
93
Neutral language
57
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links