This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Paul Hunter news.
For more Paul Hunter news, you can click here:
more Paul Hunter newsFor more drug discoveries news, you can click here:
more drug discoveries newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like drug discoveries news, you might also like this article about
drug tests. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Hair strand testing news, Hair Testing news, drug discoveries news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
drug testingGuardian
•
79% Informative
Hair-strand testing has been in use since the 1990s and is commonplace in family courts.
It is designed to show whether a parent has consumed drugs or excessive alcohol.
But the process used to interpret the results can be misleading and carries a risk of racial bias.
Paul Hunter , an expert in the field of drug testing, said “non-drug users are losing their children” He said the biggest problem is the use of “cut-off levels”, the threshold above which a person is considered to be a drug user.
A positive hair strand test can be the sole or most significant factor regardless of everything else.
Barristers from 4PB and MSB Solicitors have formed an open letter to improve the family justice system.
The charity, Taking A Strand , organised the open letter and formed the campaign.
It argues hair-strand testing should be treated as expert opinion evidence.
VR Score
80
Informative language
79
Neutral language
31
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
6
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links