Treasury Accused of 'Dubious' Claims
This is a news story, published by The Times & The Sunday Times, that relates primarily to Paul Johnson news.
Paul Johnson news
For more Paul Johnson news, you can click here:
more Paul Johnson newsNews about inflation
For more inflation news, you can click here:
more inflation newsThe Times & The Sunday Times news
For more news from The Times & The Sunday Times, you can click here:
more news from The Times & The Sunday TimesAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about inflation, you might also like this article about
national insurance contributions. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest national insurance hike news, Treasury officials news, news about inflation, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
national insuranceThe Times & The Sunday Times
•Treasury accused of ‘dubious’ facts over national insurance
65% Informative
Social media post said there would be no increases to rate of income tax, national insurance or VAT ’ rate of employer’s national insurance contributions was raised by 1.2 percentage points to 15 per cent at the budget, effective from April 6, 2025 .
Institute for Fiscal Studies director Paul Johnson said: “Seriously? At best this is dubious. What is the point in pushing this line?”.
VR Score
69
Informative language
67
Neutral language
76
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links