This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Richard Reeves news.
For more Richard Reeves news, you can click here:
more Richard Reeves newsFor more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
Richard Reeves. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest male voters news, gender issues news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
ReevesGuardian
•
70% Informative
Richard Reeves is the president of the American Institute for Boys and Men , which he started in 2023 to bettering the education, mental health, and work and family life of men.
He says he understands why so many chose to vote Republican .
Reeves says the Democrats failed to speak directly to men about their policy platform.
The Dems didn't do well enough among women to offset the gains that the Republicans made among men.
Republicans found success in the idea that the success of women has come at the expense of men.
The danger is that Democrats need to double on attacks on patriarchy and toxic masculinity.
If Democrats draw the conclusion that it was because it was a female candidate, that will be the wrong conclusion.
It will insult the male voters they need and it will hobble the careers of female politicians, potentially for a long time.
I presume the conclusion they’re also going to reach is that they can’t run a.
female candidate for a really long time?.
VR Score
74
Informative language
71
Neutral language
53
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
36
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links