This is a Toronto news story, published by torontosun, that relates primarily to Dick news.
For more Toronto news, you can click here:
more Toronto newsFor more Dick news, you can click here:
more Dick newsFor more basketball news, you can click here:
more basketball newsFor more news from torontosun, you can click here:
more news from torontosunOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like basketball news, you might also like this article about
Raptors. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Former Raptors star news, Cleveland Cavaliers news, basketball news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
RAPTORS NOTEStorontosun
•
79% Informative
Raptors lost 122-107 to the Kings at the Golden 1 Center on Wednesday night .
The Kings exposed Toronto ’s No. 1 problem in the fourth quarter .
The Raptors are too foul-prone, too susceptible on defence, too sloppy and, to be perfectly candid, too stupid when defending back-door cuts or asked to rotate.
Raptors have extended their defence knowing that once an opponent is operating in the half court, breakdowns are inevitable.
On nights when Dick is unable to drain a single shot from beyond the arc, he gets into foul trouble and is held to a season-low seven points.
The Raptors are nowhere near average, made worse when an opponent such as the Kings emerge with a plus-13 rebounding edge and attempt 17 more three throws.
VR Score
80
Informative language
79
Neutral language
40
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
42
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links