This is a Canada news story, published by Slate Magazine, that relates primarily to Rosalie Silberman Abella news.
For more Canada news, you can click here:
more Canada newsFor more Rosalie Silberman Abella news, you can click here:
more Rosalie Silberman Abella newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Slate Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Slate MagazineOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
American constitutional jurisprudence. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest constitutional courts news, constitutional court news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Supreme Court justicesSlate Magazine
•70% Informative
Rosalie Silberman Abella : There is a huge difference between courts that restrict rights and courts that expand them.
Abella shared her view of the role of constitutional courts in a democracy and why the U.S. Supreme Court’s annual flurry of opinions that are doomed to be lost to the news cycle is anything but inevitable.
An independent media is the mirror, Abella says, telling us what we look like.
The U.S. Supreme Court is conducting itself like the girl that pops out of the cake at the birthday party back in the 1950s .
The court should be finding out What does a constitution mean in this particular case? If the court is bringing its own version of what the truth is and not listening, then it’s not doing its job of actually checking the legislature.
Canada 's Supreme Court's jurisprudence is cited more than anyone else’s than any other Western democracy.
The court invites the press the day before , to get a briefing from the executive legal officer who will explain the background of the case.
Ours come out when they come out, but it's their tradition and, as I say, they're not open to change.
VR Score
69
Informative language
67
Neutral language
53
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
33
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links