"For You" Election Update Disappoints Users
This is a Threads news story, published by TechCrunch, that relates primarily to Kamala Harris news.
Threads news
For more Threads news, you can click here:
more Threads newsKamala Harris news
For more Kamala Harris news, you can click here:
more Kamala Harris newsNews about Us federal elections
For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsTechCrunch news
For more news from TechCrunch, you can click here:
more news from TechCrunchAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
old optimistic posts. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest outdated election coverage news, election night news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
old postsTechCrunch
•'For You' feeds fail on election night, offering outdated information, angering users | TechCrunch
77% Informative
Threads users were frustrated on election night as they highlighted hours -old posts that no longer reflected the current state of the race.
Many users complained about seeing hopeful posts about a Kamala Harris win, and those urging voters to “stay in line” even after it was clear that Harris was losing ground to President-elect Trump in battleground states.
The reverse chronological feed these users wanted on Threads already exists.
VR Score
76
Informative language
72
Neutral language
47
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links