Billionaire Vetoes Harris's Endorsement
This is a Gaza news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong news.
Gaza news
For more Gaza news, you can click here:
more Gaza newsBillionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong news
For more Billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong news, you can click here:
more Billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong newsNews about Us federal elections
For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
Hamas attacks. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Palestinian coastal territory news, Harris endorsement news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
GazaGuardian
•Los Angeles Times owner cites Gaza war as a reason not to endorse Harris
66% Informative
Billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong vetoed the paper's endorsement of Kamala Harris for president.
He cited the war in Gaza as a compelling reason to withhold support from the Democratic nominee.
His daughter, Nika, suggested the issue reminded her father of his family background in apartheid South Africa .
VR Score
60
Informative language
50
Neutral language
80
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links