This is a US news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsFor more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
campaign rhetoric. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest extreme politics news, fierce political division news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Aggressive nationalismGuardian
•54% Informative
Donald Trump ’s record of refusal to concede defeat after the last US election should have disqualified him from running in this one.
Aggressive nationalism that bristles with racism, misogyny and swaggering machismo is an old style in American politics.
But the internet culture, marked by short attention spans, narcissism and impatient consumer appetites, has a more natural affinity with shallow demagoguery than with representative democracy.
The currency of comparison with 20th-century dictators has been dulled by overuse.
Fascist’ is a label that has been applied too casually and too often as unthinking abuse to be rehabilitated as a tool with moral precision and rhetorical impact more than 100 years after it was coined.
That doesn’t mean the lessons of the 1920s and 1930s are irrelevant to the current predicament.
VR Score
60
Informative language
60
Neutral language
26
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links