Rachel Reeves Denies Tax Hikes
This is a news story, published by The Times & The Sunday Times, that relates primarily to Rachel Reeves news.
Rachel Reeves news
For more Rachel Reeves news, you can click here:
more Rachel Reeves newsNews about United kingdom business & economics
For more United kingdom business & economics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom business & economics newsThe Times & The Sunday Times news
For more news from The Times & The Sunday Times, you can click here:
more news from The Times & The Sunday TimesAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom business & economics, you might also like this article about
further tax rises. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest unaccounted spending news, taxes news, news about United kingdom business & economics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
more tax risesThe Times & The Sunday Times
•It was wrong to promise I wouldn’t raise taxes, says Reeves
67% Informative
Rachel Reeves raised taxes by 40 billion and increased borrowing by 140 billion .
She said there is 'no need' for further tax rises on working people’ despite Labour manifesto pledge not to increase taxes.
Labour claims it inherited a 22 billion hole from the Conservatives after the election.
VR Score
73
Informative language
73
Neutral language
58
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
50
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links