Wikipedia: Curiosity-led Online Wandering
This is a Netflix news story, published by Phys Org, that relates primarily to Wikipedia news.
Netflix news
For more Netflix news, you can click here:
more Netflix newsculture news
For more culture news, you can click here:
more culture newsPhys Org news
For more news from Phys Org, you can click here:
more news from Phys OrgAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like culture news, you might also like this article about
Wikipedia users. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Wikipedia groundbreaking news, encyclopedia Wikipedia news, culture news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Wikipedia readersPhys Org
•Going down a Wikipedia rabbit hole? Science says you're one of these three types
87% Informative
Wikipedia is one of the world's most popular websites, with more users than Amazon , Netflix , TikTok or ChatGPT.
A new study examines data about Wikipedia readers' activities.
It looks at the different "architectural styles of curiosity" people embody when they navigate.
Busybodys, hunters and dancers were identified by their forward leaps between disparate topics.
Study suggests ways Wikipedia (and sites like it) could better support curiosity-driven exploration.
Understanding technologies that shape our access to information is more important than ever.
Studying Wikipedia readers reveals a rich picture of people's freely expressed, diverse online curiosities.
It shows an alternative to technologies built on narrower assumptions about what people value and how we learn.
VR Score
88
Informative language
88
Neutral language
49
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
19
Source diversity
13
Affiliate links
no affiliate links