US Seeks FTX Donations' Return
This is a US news story, published by CoinGape, that relates primarily to Sam Bankman-Fried news.
US news
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsSam Bankman-Fried news
For more Sam Bankman-Fried news, you can click here:
more Sam Bankman-Fried newscrypto trading & speculation news
For more crypto trading & speculation news, you can click here:
more crypto trading & speculation newsCoinGape news
For more news from CoinGape, you can click here:
more news from CoinGapeAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like crypto trading & speculation news, you might also like this article about
US Government Pushes PACs. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Senate Majority PAC news, former FTX executives Sam Bankman news, crypto trading & speculation news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
political donationsCoinGape
•U.S. granted more time to negotiate return of $13.25M in FTX-linked donations to Democrat-aligned PACs
72% Informative
A judge granted the US until Jan. 15, 2025 , to negotiate the return of $ 13.25 M in FTX-linked donations to Democrat -aligned PACs.
Donations made by Sam Bankman-Fried and Nishad Singh before FTX ’s collapse.
Singh avoided prison with supervised release, testifying he made some donations at Bankman 's instruction.
The government is negotiating with PACs to determine the forfeitability of donations received.
VR Score
69
Informative language
70
Neutral language
66
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links