This is a U.S. news story, published by Phys Org, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsFor more news from Phys Org, you can click here:
more news from Phys OrgOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
public speeches. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest dishonest witnesses news, Body language experts news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Body languagePhys Org
•
81% Informative
Body language experts have been having a field day since the U.S. presidential debate.
They want us to believe that it's possible to tell what Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are thinking, but not saying, just by looking at their body and facial movements.
Julian Zelizer : There is no scientifically validated dictionary that can be used to "read" body and.
facial movements from a simple glance, like words in a language.
Zelizer says there is no "Pinocchio effect," i.e., body or facial movements that demonstrate who is honest and who is dishonest.
Some judges have decided that child victims of sexual crimes were not credible because they did not show an expected behavior or did show an unexpected behavior.
For example, children who showed no emotion when they testified were not deemed credible.
In the name of the public interest, we should be looking closely at the attention they receive.
VR Score
82
Informative language
81
Neutral language
54
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
14
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links