This is a Calgary news story, published by calgaryherald, that relates primarily to Beltline BIA news.
For more Calgary news, you can click here:
more Calgary newsFor more Beltline BIA news, you can click here:
more Beltline BIA newsFor more health policy news, you can click here:
more health policy newsFor more news from calgaryherald, you can click here:
more news from calgaryheraldOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about health policy, you might also like this article about
Calgary city council. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest provincial jurisdiction news, provincial matters news, news about health policy, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
provincial healthcalgaryherald
•
64% Informative
Calgary city council voted 9 -5 not to give the province the go-ahead to close a supervised drug consumption site in the Beltline .
Safeworks supervised consumption site opened at the Sheldon M. Chumir Health Centre in the fall of 2017 .
Many area residents and business owners claim it has brought more crime and social disorder.
But a University of Calgary nursing professor feels it was the best outcome — not only for the people who rely on the site, but also first responders.
Beltline BIA expresses support for supervised consumption site.
The site is the only one of its kind in Calgary and provides “crucial, life-saving services” The BIA said it would have liked to see more fulsome support of the site.
VR Score
64
Informative language
60
Neutral language
42
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
11